Does petitioner retain any rights, if so, what are they, and by what standard should they be judged?

Questions Presented for Review There is a class in America today, that it has become fashionable to diminish their rights and lives, to where they are of little value. In keeping with this new tradition, the Fifth Circuit has created an American case system by pronouncing a form of civil death upon the petitioner. By manipulating the truth, The Fifth Circle Panel expressed in their opinion that petitioner is not to be afforded protection for his liberty or property under any constitutional provision, both to be forfeited to the state, being considered de minimis restrictions that do not impose atypical and significant hardship. There was no right to treatment interest because it is not in the states. His legal Mail can go undelivered for months to be considered only negligent. The Force can be used that caused bruising, bleeding, scarring of hands with nerve damage to be considered only de minimis injury. He does not deserve human dignity when it causes only psychological injury. And the state is allowed to punish the spoken word. The class is considered as patients not prisoners referred to as Sexual Violent Predator. Therefore, the questions proposed are: 1. Does petitioner retain any rights, if so, what are they, and by what standard should they be judged? 2. Does the privileges and immunities clause impose a duty protection by the sovereign’s criminals’ law? 3. If no defendants have been served and the appeal court dismisses the claim for failure to brief should the pro se litigant should be allowed to rebrief? ii