No. 21-5482
Michael Deshon Matthews v. John Davids, Warden
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-rights court-costs due-process restitution right-to-counsel sixth-amendment speedy-trial substitute-counsel
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did trial court err in denying defendant's motion for substitute counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW _1. DID TRIAL COURT ERR IN DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION: FOR SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL IN VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES AND MICHIGAN CONSTITUTIONS? 2. WAS MR. MATTHEWS DEPRIVED OF HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT , TO A SPEEDY TRIAL WHERE HE WAS ARRESTED ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 22,2015 AND TRAIL BEGAN ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2016? See 3. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN ASSESSING MR. MATTHEWS $1,200 IN COURT COSTS? 4. DID THE TRIAL COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRETION BY ORDERING $7,005. IN ; RESTITIUTION?
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2021)