No. 21-5494
IFP
Tags: attempted-homicide court-of-appeals criminal-law double-jeopardy due-process indigent-counsel predicate-offenses sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should this Court decide what crimes are predicate of Attempted First Degree Intentional Homicide because the Law is not settled yet, nor has this Court ruled on Double Jeopardy as of this date?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : J. * — QUESTION(S)—~ PRESENTED . Should this Court decide what crimes are predicate of Attempted First Degree Intentional Homicide because the Law is not settled yet, nor has this Court ruled on Double Jeopardy as of this date ? Should Petitioner have been appointed counsel before he was Sanctioned by both the Wisconsin Court Of Appeals, and the U.S. Court Of Appeals (7th Cir. I11.), and Fined because of his indigency ? ‘ N a
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2021-09-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-15
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
In Re Eric W. Poirier
Eric William Poirier — Petitioner