No. 21-5495
José Yeyille v. Armandina Acosta-Leon, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts certiorari discretionary-review due-process equal-protection first-amendment florida-constitution fourteenth-amendment indigent-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Florida Constitution Article V, Section 3(b)(3) and Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (1980) intentionally bar discretionary review for Petitions for Writs of CERTIORARI to the Florida Supreme Court to indigents and indigent PRO*SE Black and Hispanic parties in violation of their Equal Protection and Due Process rights, and Access to Courts rights protected by Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and the Petition Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : a All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent Armandina Acosta-Leon, et al. to respond filed.
2021-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2021)
Attorneys
Armandina Acosta-Leon, et al.
Walter James Harvey — The Schoo Board Attorneys Office, Respondent
Jose Yeyille
Jose Yeyille — Petitioner