No. 21-5496
José Yeyille v. Armandina Acosta-Leon, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: access-to-courts discretionary-review due-process equal-protection first-amendment florida-constitution fourteenth-amendment petition-clause
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Florida Constitution Article V, Section 3(b)(3) and Jenkins v. State, 385 So. 2d 1356 (1980) intentionally bar discretionary review for Petitions for Writs of CERTIORARI to the Florida Supreme Court to indigents and indigent PRO*SE Black and Hispanic parties in violation of their Equal Protection and Due Process rights, and Access to Courts rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment and the Petition Clause of the First Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-27
Waiver of right of respondent Armandina Acosta-Leon, et al. to respond filed.
2021-08-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2021)
Attorneys
Armandina Acosta-Leon, et al.
Walter James Harvey — The School Boards Attorneys Office, Respondent
Walter James Harvey — The School Boards Attorneys Office, Respondent