No. 21-5500

John Richard Smith v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability constitutional-violation due-process exculpatory-evidence fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 5th Circuit Court of Appeal errored in denying petitioner's request for a (C.0.A.) claiming Petitioner failed to state a Constitutional violation?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the 5th Circuit Court of Appeal errored in denying petitioner's request for a (C.0.A.) claiming Petitioner failed to state a Constitutional violation? “Ulhere Petitioner claimed he has been prejudiced by counsel's failure to investigate accused only viable defense available and failure to call available eye witness, which violated his Sixth Ammendment right which is protected under the United States Constitution. Whether the 5th Circuit of Appeals errored in denying Petitioner's . request for a (C.0.A.) claiming Petitioner failed to State a Constitutional violation? : Where Petitioner claimed he was denied Due Process by the Prosecution withholding of Exculpatory Evidence which violated his Fifth and Fourteenth Ammendment rights which is protected under the Constitution of the United States. Oe

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)

Attorneys

John Richard Smith
John Richard Smith — Petitioner
John Richard Smith — Petitioner