No. 21-5502

Lucio P. Munoz v. Nebraska

Lower Court: Nebraska
Docketed: 2021-08-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-rights due-process hearsay ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel motion-in-limine postconviction-relief
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-nebraska-courts-decisions-concerning-hearsay-conform-to-the-established-rule-of-evidence

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA COURTS DECISIONS CONCERNING "HEARSAY' CONFORMS TO THE ESTABLISHED RULE OF EVIDENCE ON THIS SUBJECT? : WHETHER OR NOT NEBRASKA POSTCONVICTION: RELIEF ACT COMPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, UNDER THE 5TH AND 14TH AMENDMENTS, AND THEREWITH BEARING A CONUNDRUM THAT VIOLATES PETITIONER'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. BASED UPON THE CLAIMS PRESENTED BY PETITIONER IN ; HIS MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF, WAS PETITIONER ENTITLED TO RELIEF, AS PLED? WHETHER OR NOT THE NEBRASKA SUPREME COURT ERRED IN ITS DECISION REGARDING THE ADJUDICATION FOR THE PETITIONER'S ALIBI DEFENSE, INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, MOTION IN LIMINE, SUPPRESSION OF STATEMENTS, EXPERT WITNESS, AND THE HEARDSAY CLAIMS PROPOUNDED IN THE POSTCONVICTION MOTION AT ISSUE? : $3 $s iy

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-10
Waiver of right of respondent Nebraska to respond filed.
2021-08-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2021)

Attorneys

Lucio P. Munoz
Lucio P. Munoz — Petitioner
Lucio P. Munoz — Petitioner
Nebraska
James A. CampbellNebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent
James A. CampbellNebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent