Whether the court below erred in dismissing petitioner's claims

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED LLP Pie plied see phe Ae bbe infidel ervef eat now, spony boiaL, by Fores me jg dasen doy fous’ 7, bh or pol ZL oliver. Ye Co Yetjpoon nip F05E2 pets Cg Gouee | Chin l/ by y fpviry, “OH fone ey ty LOGIC one” he or nA Pb Lhe Fe Abe rife pe penbuech ef 4 Lew Seoks,e G WW wv Re LAO Lee fr OE? edly py pose/ yore {,. fo [ov GP le pele! tries) 2 the be OF pw LAE hole a prenaeey ay rere wypendiey eal Lh ntti g: Wee a we pny Mog Len feel ME oH / Dif eh AT VA ert» Pay CHOMP AE rebel eter ~ SCL ATCO ~ nia? e QashonT yy (re ented (FA Moe tment) 4 AMA ter on 20k fi ke ele ey ¢fliwel , PA fwd. fot, fear Or 42694 1 wf f byron pe fed, fs, Gregas? Sa VEE Oo” ge ZK SKE fivros SUES oot! Fe fowler “1 nvr Siok 2 feor 4 or Or Y 220 afoot! 2 Ble; 2f,. A prot Lue porercrel D VA Le, yp evel As shel o / fy Lew Lewes ?