Prayed v. Department of Labor, et al.
Arbitration ERISA Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Has the Petitioner's substantive rights been abridged, a violation of 28-USC-2072(b), by the Court rules and procedures effecting encroachment of an American's First, Fifth, Ninth, and Tenth-Amendment guarantees
QUESTION PRESENTED In this case specifically, has the Petitioner’ s substantive rights been abridged, a violation of 28 USC 2072 (b), by the Court rules and procedures effecting encroachment of an American’s First, Fifth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendment guarantees vested within our Constitution for the United States of America, thereby impeding his service to this nation advancing argument promoting the creation of positive law in matters of first impression relevant to the Labor Management and Reporting Disclosure Act of 1959, As Amended (LMRDA), and to fairness standards and nondiscriminatory safeguards for an employee when Union leadership, as the “exclusive representative”, receives the majority of their respective income from the employer, and to the responsibility vested in the Court to administer adherence and remedy inequitable conduct by inferior courts as pertains to existing rules of practice and procedures constituting good Behavior when holding office or is it most appropriate that these important issues need be reviewed and resolved by this Court? y D Bo