whether-petitioner's-claims-should-be-heard-on-the-merits

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER PETITIONER'S CLAIMS SHOULD BE HEARD ON THE MERITS UNDER THE QUE PROCESS OUAUSE OF THE 44TH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TO AVOID A MISCARRIAGE OF SUSTICE WHERE NEW EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT PETITIONER IS INNOCENT OF THE CRIME? II. WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS OF THE LAW AND A FAIA TATA WHERE THE PROSECUTOR KNGWINGUY USED FAUSE EVIDENCE TO OBTAIN A TAINTED. CONVICTION AND FAIVED TO CORRECT FALSE TESTIMONY? ; III. WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DENIED QUE PROCESS OF THE LAW AND A FAIA TAIAL WHERE THE PROSECUTION DESTROYED EVIDENCE IN BAD FAITH? IV. WHETHER PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL’ RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION AS ENVISIONED . BY THE SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WAS DENIED? . . i