No. 21-5524

Miguel Andres Lara-Unzueta v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-08-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8-usc-1252 8-usc-1326 deportation deportation-proceeding due-process immigration-law judicial-review procedural-rights removable-alien
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a deportation proceeding deprive a removable alien of the opportunity for judicial review under 8 U.S.C. §1326(d)(2)?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I 1. Does a deportation proceeding deprive a removable alien of the opportunity for judicial review under 8 U.S.C. §1326(d)(2) where neither the IJ nor the BIA provide advice of such right nor advice of the various requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1252 for such a petition?? Il. 2. Is petitioner entitled to a presumption of prejudice in the absence of a record resulting from the erroneous refusal to conduct a § 212 (c) hearing? If so, may the court consider the expanded record where the standard of review is not plain error?

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Miguel Lara-Unzueta
Atmore L Baggot — Petitioner
Atmore L Baggot — Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent