James Takchuan Woo v. Colorado
AdministrativeLaw FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Whether the Colorado Court of Appeals erred in concluding that Woo's constitutional rights to effective-assistance-of-counsel, fair-trial, right-against-unlawful-search, were not violated
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Whether The Colorado Court of Appeals erred. in concluding thal Wods conshifutional rights to effective assislance of counsel and a fair Tria) were nof Violaled by the Trial court's denial of his Conlinvance reguesls based on the proseculion's discovery violahions . I. Whether the Covtf of Appeals evred in concluding that the improper admission of TesTimony narraling video-Surveillance footage as well as a timeline Summary of events allegedly depicled in the video was harmless and did nof deprive Woo of his right to a fair trial. It. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in Concluding that Woo's Constikitional right againsf unlawfo] Search was nof violated by The Trial Court's denial of his mofion Jo Suppress evidence Seized afler the unlawtu! entry of his storage unit. i