No. 21-5548
Brent Anderson v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure double-counting firearm-possession plain-error reckless-endangerment sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines vehicular-flight
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court plainly err when it applied a 2-level enhancement for 'reckless endangerment during flight' after already applying a 4-level 'in connection with another felony' enhancement for the same conduct?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the district court plainly err when it applied a 2-level enhancement for “reckless endangerment during flight” after already applying a 4-level “in connection with another felony” enhancement for the same conduct? II. Did the district court plainly err when it found that Mr. Anderson used or possessed a firearm “in connection with” vehicular flight even though he threw the firearm out of the window of the vehicle mid-flight? 1
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Brent Anderson
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent