No. 21-5563
William Ferguson v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-242 18-usc-924c crime-of-violence criminal-procedure davis-ruling due-process johnson-ruling johnson-v-united-states predicate-offense section-924c statutory-interpretation united-states-v-davis
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's convictions for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) should be vacated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Whether a defendant’s convictions for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) should be vacated, where each § 924(c) charge had, as an underlying predicate, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242, which is not a crime of violence after Johnson v. United States, 576 U.S. 591 (2015) and United States v. Davis, 189 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). i Statement of
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-08-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2021)
Attorneys
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
William Ferguson
Brianna Fuller Mircheff — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner