Whether the defendant was denied the opportunity to fully cross-examine the key government witness

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED “TE. Wheirer, the delindant udas denied the Oppurtuviky to Fully CRossexamine “The KO, Government Lortness. , TIL. hetrer Cnomd 18 Tequiees to dtteaminers if the govtenment Violates t's discavery vidlations and, IF so, Whether Yrs dlépeivw the deBrdant og ow Cave Liat, ar. Winevhec, toe Court €9rto 10 Sentencing tise. Afendant becass (a) Gove nmvente SUMENCING entrapment or Semtnung fs chor MAMpulaton Vidaeo due process by nC lecting the amount of drugs atlebvtabke. ~s nes Cb) foo failure to repuce the de Qrdant § Quidthine Cangt tor his minienal / , Taper the Cine Wena GE ANIDOE. CO The lenge or (c) : TW \N beter MWe deQndants trial conse provvoen in Dehive arene of COUNSEL WN Cawlens YO Corse The aboue ISSOES and ~ hing te INSor that Tne recorn Was SoD, crenthy dtuelepew OT Was te deDerdsrk dlenien he Cpvetucity to — | Fully. CRoss= EyvAenine J (sovtznment Key Driness 2 | PE Es a Rumed ptguietn te Determine of I the Gov sennents Discoutry iOleftons clepeved the cleferndant of a faz >ecol, . — TTT Dd Yan trol Couct Epes 5 Searteneinng I AL Did Ye Government's Sentencing Entrapment 02 _ Semencing Factor Mauipishon Vidlet doe peectas ? [To Renuce The Girdetine Range foe. Delrdent's ; ! Wimal ot Minder Role ? EB Cea Wig HB? TAN. Did Yhe deQerdonts terial Counsel Fail +e | labect SoMicrenth, to the Discory Vidlashong Aws | “een Abhoas ON C2053 7 Ar Noro ot Carl IN COk3 Kar he OLD ) Fhicrenth, Atovlopep ho __ i onsicornr iINeecdive Ga Starck OF Counsel? I enti biiott of See ch : : easiest of Comphants SF TES [ ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of ; all