Do the defendants have the right to abuse an elderly and disabled person without the law doing anything about it?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED: . 1. DO THE DEFENDANTS HAVE ANY RIGHT TO ABUSE AN ELDERLY AND DISABLED PERSON. WITHOUT THE LAW DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT? 2.. DO THE LAW PROHIBIT ABUSE OF CHILDREN under 18 ,18 WITHOUT DIONG ANYTHING ABOUT? : 3. DO THE LAW ENCOURAGES US BANK TRUST AND CALIBER HOME LOAN EVICTING PATRICK CHARLES AND FAMILY FORM HIS HOME A DEBT NOT OWED FOR A DEBT NOT OWED AND THE COURTS SHOW NO JUSTICE? ; 4. THE DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE VIOLATED THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION ACT, BY WANTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE DEBT OF THE FORMER OWNER, RALPTH T. BROWN, WHEN THE LAW PROHIBITS? 5. WHAT ABOUT THE DAMAGES CAUSED BY CALIBER HOME LOANS AND US BANKK TRUST N.A., INFLICTING PAIN , EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DEPRESSION , ABUSING PLAINTIF , PUTTING HIM AND FAMILY, DESTROYING HIS PROPERTY , PLAINTIFF WAS DEPRIVED OF HIS MEDICAL SERVICES IN HIS HOME, MEDICATION, CAUSING RISK TO HIS LIFE WHILE ON THE STREET, WITHOUT FOOD AND WATER, PLAINTIF IS UNDER GOING PHYCHIRATIC COUNSELING , THE REST OF THE FAMILY IS UNDERGOING COUNSELING DUE TO ABUSE, CAN THE COURTS ALLOW THE DAMAGES TO GO FREE? PLAINTIFF IS A VICTIM OF CIRCUMSTANCE. 6.6D0 THE LAW PROHIBITS VIOLATION OF AND A ELDERLY AND CHILDREN AND ALLOW THE ABUSERUS BANK TRUST AND CALIBER HOME GO FREE WITH OUT PENALTY? 7. THE JUDGE IN THE DISTRICT COURT VIOLATED PLAINTIFF CONSTITUTION RIGHT — JURY TRAIL CODE38, SHE APPROVED TRAIL BY JURY AND DPRIVED THE JURY FROM RENDERING JUDGMENT IN THE CASE, DOES THE LAW PROHIBITS SUCH VIOLATION. ? .8 THE JUDGE — KAREN N. JOHNSON IN THE US DISTRICT COURT WAS IMPARTIAL IN THE CASE SHOWED PREPRENCE OR BIAS , IMPARTIALITY , TO THE DEFENDANTS, DID NOT PLAINTIFF TO SPEAK DOING THE . HEARING , BUT THE DEFENDING JUDGE LAUREN N. BEREVELY, DID NOT PRESENT IN THE COURT BUT THE US DISTRICT JUDGE DID ALL THE SPEAKING ON HER BEHALF AND RENDER JUDGMENT IN THE CASE WHEN THE JURY WAS TO RENDER JUDGMENT, IS THIS VIOLATION PRO HIBIT? 9..SOME DOCUMENTS AND MOTION FILLED WAS BEING DENIED BY HE U.S DISTRICT JUDGE NANCY K. JOHNSON , THE ONLY MOTION THE JUDGE ACCEPTED WAS MOTION FOR JURY TRAIL, WHY DID SHE ACCEPTED IT ? BECAUSE PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS AGREED THAT JUDGMENT WAS NOT TO BE RENDERED BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE, SHE GRANTED MOTION BY JURYS BYR DEPRIVED THE JURY FROM RENDERING THE JUDGMENT IN THE CASE, IS THIS NOT IMPARTIALITY? a 10 THE JUDGE NANCY K JOHNSON, DUE TO IMPARTICIALIRY, BIAS, LOST JURISDICTION IN THE CASE, DOES HER JUDGMENT STANDS? 11. ISIT RIGHT FOR THE BANKS CALIBER HOME LOANS TO EVICT PLAINTIFF WRONGFULLY AND ABANDONED THE PROPERTY 507 SANDY WALK STAFFORD TEXAS 77477, ALLOWING THE PROPRERTY TO BE DISTROYED WITH MOLD WHEN THE PLAINTIFF AND FAMILY NEEDS A PLACT TO STAY? 12. DOES THE LAW PROHIBITS A FEDERAL JUDGE TO DEPRIVED PLAINTIFF OF JURY TRIAL WHEN THE MOTION FOR JURY TRAIL WAS APPROVED BY NANCY K JOHNSON? 13 DOES THE JUDGE IN THE CASE CHARLES ESKRIDGE DENIED A MOTION FOR JURY TRAIL WHEN IT WAS ALREADY GRANTED? 14. DO THE LAW ALLOW THE SUMMARY BY NANCY K. JOHNSON CODE 56, WHEN THE JUDGMENT IS NULL AND VOID? 15. WHAT ABOUT THE DAMAGES CAUSED TO PLAINTIFF AND FAMILY, PLAINTIFF AND FAMILY IS UNDERGOING COUNSELING AS A RESULT OF THIS WRONG FULL EVICTION? 16. THE US DISTRICT JUDGE HON. CHARLESESKRIDGE, ARTE THE CASE WAS TRANSFERRED TO HIM , AFTER HE DISMISSED THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE IN DECEMBER 22° AND CASE WAS APPEALED TO THE U.S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 5™ CIRCUIT , STILL RENDER JUDGMENT IN THE CASE, THE HON. JUDGE LOST JURISDICTION IN THAT CASE RENDER JUDGMENT , CAN HIS JUDGMENT STAND OR IT LEGAL FOR JUDGE ESKRIDGE TO RENDER JUDGMENT, WHEN HE LOST JURISDICTION? 17 .THE DEFENDANTS U.S. BANK, VIOLATED THE FDPA BY REVEALING SOMEONES DEBT TO PLAINTIFF NOT ONLY THAT REQUIRES PLAINTIFF TO PAY ANOTHERS DEBT , WHICH IS UNKOWN TO PLAINTIFF, IS THIS NOT A VIOLATIONOF THE FDPA 18. PLAINTIFF HAS NO ACCOUNT WITH YOUS BANK AND NO CONTRACTUAL AGRREMENT WITH THE , BANK BUT THE BANK U.S BANK TRUST WANTS ME TO PAY A DEBT NOT OWED IS THIS LEGAL? PLAINTIFF AND FAMILY HAS BEEN DAMAGED, SUFFERING AND