No. 21-5575
Frederick Arayatanon v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-trial defendant-rights district-court due-process evidence evidentiary-admission fair-trial jail-telephone-calls presumption-of-innocence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the District Court's admission of jail telephone calls by the defendant during trial undermine the defendant's presumption of innocence?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ee of jail telephone calls by the District Court during defendant's trial undermine defendant's presumption of innocence? Page ii: . ‘ . . SOF PARES fx] All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. . [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent