Did the Court of Appeals err in failing to base its Opinion on the evidentiary and adjudicated facts in the record

No question identified. : a QUESTION(S)-PRESEN FED QUESTION ONE: Did the Court of Appeals err in failing to base its Opinion on the evidentiary and adjudicated facts in the record i.e. the Trial Court's "judgment of conviction for Counts One and Two? QUESTION TWO: , Did the Court of Appeals err in ruling,the Trial Court had . over the offense pursuant to Penal Code Provision § With A ; Child By Sexual Contact" i.e the offense ; the Petitioner was charged and convicted -: of in Counts One and Two? QUESTION THREE: Did the Court of Appeals err in ruling the Motion to Quash and the argument in Issue Four of Petitioner's Direct Appeal Brief are not the same Issue of "Notice''? QUESTION FOUR: : : : Did the Court of Appeals err, by relying on Issues Two and Three are inadequately briefed and ~:= ; present nothing to review because Pet#*:. itioner failed to point to any element the State was required to prove as be; ing insufficiently supported by the evidence? QUESTION FIVE: : : Did the Court of Appeals erc in ruling, the Petitioner failed to provide Authority | to support his argument and the issue is improperly briefed and presents nothing for review pursuant to QUESTION SIX: Did the Court of Appeals erc in ruling, the Petitioner failed to presrve Petitioner's claim of prosecutorial vindictiveness by failing to comply with