No. 21-5579
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court-split circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admissibility evidence-rule evidentiary-standard federal-rules-of-evidence inextricably-intertwined judicial-interpretation standard-of-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'inextricably intertwined' standard is a proper exception to Fed.R.Evid. 404(b)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED a eeSs,;3;] ,:z:0Gl_ 0s TT There is a split between the United States Circuit Courts regarding whether the “inextricably intertwined” standard is a proper exception to Fed.R.Evid. 404(b), or whether a hearing should be held under Rule 404(b) regarding such evidence. ii .
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-05
Waiver of right of respondent Nebraska to respond filed.
2021-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Nebraska
James A. Campbell — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent
James A. Campbell — Nebraska Attorney General's Office, Respondent