No. 21-5583

Jordan Lee Bell v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-vagueness criminal-sentencing due-process first-amendment pornographic-matter supervised-release unconstitutionally-vague
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of 'any pornographic matter' violate due process as unconstitutionally vague?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of “any pornographic matter” violate due process as unconstitutionally vague? 2. Does a special condition of supervised release that prohibits possession or control of “any pornographic matter” violate the First Amendment? i

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-09-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Jordan Lee Bell
Brandon Elliott Beck — Federal Public Defender's Office, Northern District of Texas, Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent