Whether the U.S. District Court could equitably rule that the Petitioner's reply brief was untimely despite postal delivery suspension due to extreme winter temperatures

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the U.S. District Court which received the removal brief, on behalf of the Respondents, could Equitably rule that despite (40) degrees below zero winter temperatures, with the sending his pro se pleadings out in time, but with u.s. postal delivery trucks suspended from travel in the Grand Rapids, Michigan area at the time, could deny that the Petitioner got his reply brief in on schedule. | , | | 2