No. 21-5599
Robert Nathan Hensley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2nd-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
On an important matter, and subsequent to a capital case of Texas 5495, and east the Government VEN Prose Knowyes by Ay @ Leite peldover; Not uF B, wddeond 22 Hh jory-nfrcbon © a Le ty fen bnwt vyolrbed,, 8 Osha, Lene Aroleu fl artes, phe hia.n the bred Serf of a anFAE Nebicle and guesteo Aisa iteur rms. a8 G6 ob alow isch * BIB ple wee eT. GINO. Inprper, and asrong -ekanp/?... YK )-uty Lae mens) instr chn Phe yurg hcl, ela LM i. {- wee Koowsiogh ms purposely anis-smns dreds and oe ee owen, bet dy bral nan 2
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon was unconstitutional due to ineffective assistance of counsel and improper jury instructions
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Robert Nathan Hensley
Robert N. Hensley — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent