No. 21-5600
Linda Hardison v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-law constitutional-review court-procedure criminal-procedure documentary-evidence due-process habeas-corpus judicial-error judicial-review legal-adjudication
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the district court and the appeals' court overlook a blatant error of law when the petitioner presented all documentary evidence and declarations of law to prove her actual innocence and both courts refuse to adjudicate the claim correctly?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED CAN THE DISTRICT COURT AND THE APPEALS' COURT OVERLOOK A BLATANT ERROR OF LAW WHEN THE PETITIONER PRESENTED ALL DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE AND DECLARATIONS OF LAW TO PROVE HER ACTUAL INNOCENCE AND BOTH COURTS REFUSE TO ADJUDICATE THE CLAIM CORRECTLY? vi LL.
Docket Entries
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Linda Hardison
Linda Hardison — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent