No. 21-5601

Abdullah Hamidullah v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: colloquy constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts guilty-plea motion-to-withdraw plea-bargaining rule-11 sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the district court violate the defendant's substantial due process rights during the mandatory Rule 11 colloquy?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. DID. THE DISTRICT COURT VIOLATE THE DEFENDANT'S SUBSTANTIAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS DURING THE MANDATORY RULE 11 COLLOGUY? 2. DID THE COURT ERR WHEN THE COURT DENIED DEFENDANT'S "MOTION TO WITHDRAW GUILTY PLEA? 7

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Abdullah Hamidullah
Abdullah Hamidullah — Petitioner
Abdullah Hamidullah — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent