Whether Petitioners are proper Remedy to Confirm the reach of judicial review Court to make a decision on Misconduct pending for a long period

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ee OL L, Wuhetlor Wondomuns re propor Remedy to Conf) the reoh wolicial wee Count To MAK a Chesil on Mebchovior fending fol arg pore HAs Coot gor av umperscnab he. Lugth of tig a. Whuthur to dabsrm une the pereg usites for Warr annus reliog hole ban i Wh Noae he Thee Prokeg ussite Su ofy ag doos ploumtyf hone clear arofnrt To reloF So + clo.2$ avenda nel howe sly fo (eajorw act Cn usten and ogi a 0 of hoy adequate nmudy awadoUe i § MIBMD) OF because flawide; aibsjadly Vout abused hea wdicia) ross 31 he Jowusce, 4, Such 28 they hale Woo! loatred gro 7 Jng “eeu ache share, J Wwhithur the Plonida supreme Count umyiropan| eit ane juadung thok this cdund gomrall y wank condoler J iia Courts sud thor tna eee LA Woabred gre 4 briy Cndarin acleois thane, Comery to the tactthat the three Proreguts a9 for Monbomud belo 24 acon Sales] ral thot ali thot the Honvela le whorhor elchorrer wos Guldle 10 Maumdasiuss reir cihere Sho hag ofallsnia Clear mgd to helof souylnt ' Tho Tha 4 Judie y Corcusk Cours \udge hore @ fondrderehon any Prabal ead To MoKY a dyuiscon on hiv MsleovP fondung 1 the Court for LM rokunalfle dang! tone tamdthat She hale LhunA all Monuas And thor Thon is wo idea cts saga abvoilelje . 5, Whudhor The Flonida supmme Counk accorded 10 cadune f Aue PrOtess amd, applied the comeck Law. 3 VST: AOlG: a $$ :