No. 21-5609

Matthew Staszak v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-08
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege confidential-communications constitutional-rights due-process fifth-amendment interception legal-interception sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether petitioner's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights were deprived and violated when his attorney-client confidential communications were intercepted by the respondent(s)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WHETHER PETITIONER'S FIFTH AND SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS WERE DEPRIVED AND VIOLATED WHEN HIS ATTORNEY-CLIENT CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS WERE INTERCEPTED BY THE RESPONDENT(S). INTERESTED PARTIES The parties appear in the caption case citing on the cover page of this Writ of Certiorari. Respondent United States of America is an interested party. | | |

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2021-09-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)

Attorneys

Matthew Staszak
Matthew L. Staszak — Petitioner
Matthew L. Staszak — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent