No. 21-5635
Jamail D. Hairston v. Massachusetts
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process harmless-error miranda-rights miscarriage-of-justice police-testimony right-to-remain-silent right-to-silence sufficiency-of-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the appeals court err in holding that no substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice resulted from officer Pagan's erroneous testimony about Hairston's post-Miranda invocation of his right to remain silent by inappropriately relying on evidence that pertained to charges for which Hairston was found not guilty?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-04
Waiver of right of respondent Massachusetts to respond filed.
2021-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Massachusetts