Vinicio Jesus Garcia v. Darryl Glenn, et al.
Does the denial of the right to file a § 2254 habeas corpus claim with a court violate due-process, access-to-courts, civil-rights
No question identified. : QUESTION> PRESENTED Q Oo€s THE DEWIAL oF THE 2IGCHT TO Filea | $2254 hoot Reflres ot a claim awh aw \ouUey < @® 1S THE comPLETE AWD WAL Demnal éf SutPUE S ; to wdilrecxA tumates toaccess The court Not REPRESERT A clamand ay \WWIURYS ®D Ane vue HUMATES WKAO PROVIOED SUPPLIES — TO AN IWDIGEUT to Mecess the Count ims the . FACE oF the total dewtal of SUPPLIES arttlet to comfeusakions 2 (<>) has THE Qulie of the Cou2t of KPPEALS Fore aw 2 Ofte Cred NOL aed the SUPREME Cour ef THE Gali TED STATES ruliuls (ew the Bouud» V Smith awd heures v Care? Cases? SA Gover um cn offiuals uw0 C\rceumvere | Pel wis of the SUPREME COUT obAheWniED | STATES wor*Xo beleld accoun fables @ \5 4he form Frou vded be Lie khe 91493 | misheadiaG-? PART V awd +P |