No. 21-5650
Carl Richard Samson v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-1951 18-usc-924 attempted-robbery crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-criminal-law hobbs-act sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery is a 'crime of violence' under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether attempted Hobbs Act robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), isa “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), meaning that it “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person or property of another.” This Court granted review on this issue in United States v. Taylor, No. 20-1459, cert. granted July 2, 2021. i INTERESTED PARTIES There are no parties interested in the proceeding other than those named in the caption of the case. ii
Docket Entries
2022-07-29
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-27
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>United States</i> v. <i>Taylor</i>, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-12
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including November 12, 2021.
2021-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 13, 2021 to November 21, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-08-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent