Whether effective limitations on government power can define fraud on the court and criminal contempt in judicial misrepresentation of citizens' civil petitions

No question identified. : QUESTIONS FORREVIEW ne OL. In Limited Government terms, when are effective limitations so tangible as to define Fraud on the Court and Criminal Contempt in terms of judicial | misrepresentation of Independent Citizens’ Civil petitions against Unconstitutional State laws? 2. Abuse of Procedures: Are written opinions, final judgments, by any Federal Judge fraudulent in declaration just in terms of read and review, when apparently designed to affirm and protect, to covert, a deliberative ‘ misrepresentation, to successively maintain fraudulent disposition against | any kind of party? (Is it not a fraudulent declaration, when based upon a previous and similar fraud?) 3. IFP Screening, Whether effective case screening was irrequisite: should not District Courts and Courts of Appeals take decent and reasonable care to maintain the validity, realism, and legality of any original filing by any party proceeding in forma pauperis, and neither have misrepresented nor abridged essential, recognizable, and consensual substance of the filing?