No. 21-5657
Chris Eugene Cosner v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: armed-bank-robbery armed-robbery career-offender categorical-approach crime-of-violence criminal-law elements-clause federal-criminal-law federal-sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether armed bank robbery constitutes a crime of violence under the categorical approach of the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED This petition presents a straightforward case for certiorari review. The question presented is whether, under the categorical approach of the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), armed bank robbery constitutes a crime of violence, and whether robbery by intimidation (the least culpable conduct of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)) constitutes a crime of violence.
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-03
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-10-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2021.
2021-10-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 3, 2021 to December 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-04
Response Requested. (Due November 3, 2021)
2021-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2021)
Attorneys
Chris Eugene Cosner
Margaret Sams Gratz — Mitchell McNutt & Sams, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent