Did the trial court commit reversible error by failing to instruct the jury on Voluntary Manslaughter as a lesser-included offense of Open Murder?

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED 1) Nevada case law mandates jnstructiy on Vall fessecincluded of Lenses” of aw Open Murder charge. Did the ria] court comm reversible errr by failing fe stu be jor On Eavoluetery Manslaughter wAic ae) ~ lesser — inclded offense” of Chen Mrder? 9) lhe He GF Todicial Diskrict Core broke its ordwances— “Roles aoc Bnd S03 Ce ~ Ad theic achous revest ety honer Cpet) from Fhiivg 3 nek, Lederal habeas Corpus pettion thereby proce curraly Larcng hilt from hewg granted! a cehhcate of Appe? abil) ty" 3 Did te de feuse’ alteriey provicle per. A) 5 6*A pencligent Copchtotbowal right to efechye OSs)stance throughout the drial anal Spp<al process 4 lhen the Nevada Su reye. Cours Court of rE BPS CAS District Courte anol G4 Circuit Count of Appeals Nev. Sup.Ch. CoA US Dish Ck ayol G2Gr\ pefused to gpanik pek's mumerous requests Br IN __ evicewtiary heacing levied. hear) cid they prevent relevant fads especially aout phe inelCective asnstewce of covwsSe] AC) fom STDs the aching of vas Hen Spc MDA US. Dish Ch and Tee resept suf Geiew evi CCE, Suppor’ clay of cConsprac cagainst He pet -g