No. 21-5664
Maurice L. Ross v. United States
IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c appellate-review attempted-robbery crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-criminal-law hobbs-act sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 924(c)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 924(c), since the elements of Hobbs Act robbery, especially attempted Hobbs Act robbery, which may be completed through an attempted threat alone, fall outside of the definition of a crime of violence necessary for conviction under 18 U.S.C. 924(c)? 1
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-29
Reply of petitioner Maurice L. Ross filed. (Distributed)
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-14
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 14, 2021)
Attorneys
Maurice L. Ross
Richard F. Maffett Jr. — Richard F. Maffett, Jr., Petitioner
Richard F. Maffett Jr. — Richard F. Maffett, Jr., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent