No. 21-5666

William Marcellus Campbell v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 6th-amendment abuse-of-discretion appellate-review confrontation-clause cooperating-witness criminal-procedure de-novo-review sentencing
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Defendant's 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause Rights are violated when a district court judge prohibits questions to a cooperating accomplice about the maximum sentence they would face prior to any reduction for substantial assistance cooperation?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. There is a split in the federal courts of appeals and several state courts regarding the following question: Whether a Defendant’s 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause Rights are violated when a district court judge prohibits questions to a cooperating accomplice about the maximum sentence they would face prior to any reduction for substantial assistance cooperation? 2. There is a split in the Circuits and several state courts regarding the following question: whether appellate courts should review violations of Confrontation Clause de novo or for abuse of discretion? i

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-11-15
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-10-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 15, 2021.
2021-10-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2021 to November 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2021)

Attorneys

United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
William Campbell
Rockne ColeCole Law Firm, PC, Petitioner
Rockne ColeCole Law Firm, PC, Petitioner