Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals improperly applied mootness and the collateral order doctrine

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals for the State of Hawaii . improperly applied mootness to dismiss the case by bypassing the federal question . of whether it applied an impermissible offensive use of the collateral order doctrine to the foreclosure decree to preclude a collateral attack of jurisdiction from the order confirming sale? ; (2) Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals for the State of Hawaii improperly applied mootness to dismiss the case by bypassing the federal question . of whether Petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment section rights of one due process | and equal protection were violated by the cumulative effect of the Hawaii | foreclosure proceeding, including the impermissible offensive application of the | ) | collateral order doctrine rule to the foreclosure decree to preclude a collateral attack of jurisdiction from the order confirming sale? | J