No. 21-568
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure extraordinary-and-compelling-reasons extraordinary-circumstances federal-law federal-law-change judicial-discretion retroactivity sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether non-retroactive changes in federal law can serve as 'extraordinary and compelling reasons' warranting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether non-retroactive changes in federal law can serve as “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warranting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).
Docket Entries
2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-22
Reply of petitioner Jason Jarvis filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-08
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-11-17
Brief amici curiae of FAMM and NACDL filed.
2021-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 8, 2021.
2021-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2021)
Attorneys
FAMM and NACDL
Joshua Adam Matz — Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, Amicus
Joshua Adam Matz — Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, Amicus
Jason Jarvis
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent