whether-respondent-waived-forfeited-procedural-defenses

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | WHETHER RESPONDENT WAIVED/FORFEITED ANY OF IT’S PROCEDURAL DEFENSES IN McGIRT’S DECISION AND RESPONDENT IS PROCEDURALLY BARRED FROM ASSERTING ANY IF IT’S PREVIOUS PROCEDURAL DEFENSES THAT WERE AVAILABLE AGAINST | PETITIONER’S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION CLAIM IN } COLLATERAL POST CONVICTION PROCEEDINGS WHEN CONVICTION | WAS FINAL ? | | WHETHER McGIRT V. OKLAHOMA ANNOUNCED A NEW VINDICATIVE | REPLACEMENT OF SUBSTANTIVE RULE DICTATED BY PRIOR } PRECEDENT MADE RETROACTIVE BY TEAGUE’S EXCEPTION TO NON} RETROACTIVITY ? WHICH RESPONDENT REFUSED TO APPLY RETROACTIVELY AS STATE POSTCONVICTION RELIEF TO CASES | FINAL WHEN McGIRT WAS DECIDED ON JULY 09, 2020 ? | WHETHER LACK OF SEMINOLES NATIONS VOLUNTARY CONSENT TO | SHARED ASSUMPTION OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION BY | RESPONDENTS AND ATTEMPTED EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL POWER BY RESPONDENTS IS VOID ? | t i ii |