Whether the petitioner was denied due process under the Fourteenth Amendment and the protections of the Takings Clause, as established in Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED LP RECCADIN, To_ME UNKTED ATE Lonimitarion AMEnmEnT V_AmAd ClEvElAn® BemRD of EL Vv. , Aovdenmll. 10% $67: 198701985), am 1 nor Enevied wD WE ROUT we Oe Process To : : _« ACCORD INL fo WE GATED Stace} Cnsritwtion Ammomar Ul and Smem Vv. Padhes 85 US. 1204 ,V24_ 102 4.€7. Ao, 944. Ti _LEd 24 1B (1982) nm | SOT ENNTIED 1 PrarEection Kem & Sino Sony to wihen Docraine LxtENdS “B Coven Ween BrAs 7 . . ' edi nor me varteD Seoses COBNT GE _APPEDIS GE mE WT mimi teint DUT of Aawidiny . © Accend ins to 2B SCS $ SBOE) and + Sinem ve MeOanrel, $24 VS, 473,4B%(20c0) | SY BSTANTIAN SWouIinG oF «we Demal & A Consecronronl RiGuT? ; © Des a Coune Wave A BUM w CEfeEmZe Evidence wn a BzeENDares Cavern § © usa Uy ARE co DISCRETION Go UKE LhELINSOA W _OPine in CnEner ce) REmmeER 1,380 v5. 377 (ASL) 5 Grove v Runes» 455 US. 208. (86U) | Senows v OAENE, Yat L ! £38 328( Sewn Tasle) §_utianga vows, 993 6.24 282 (Ten 1B) ane Sway + 6 We Eunprmentolld ungove usin Peotcounal Dx eracess 5 Wun benes wulene Oy | CALAN Cndrtions wien Predomrce Pp Mode InGanr ¢ , . co | & 16, PS STATED wy ue Pinion Gu we Clty CRevir Con _imghes SAGA PIAS Claim | fo OPEN Buestion of tiganlu Grass Federal lars, And <0, 6 ac Supreme Coury. oF ; AWE UMTED STATES CAPRHIE And ENING TH ANDREA WAC 95VE MY EStaBiiguinG A Seantand | : Fon We Counrs © Gollan ns APPRRENTIY 1 NEEDED And/or Necksaey 7 — . © 19 ix Gin -w Weve an orc & te Gow on te Suny, ler alone as Jury Foran . t ‘ >