Whether states' seizure of prisoners' stimulus payments violate the federal exemption statutes within the CARES Act and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER STATES SEIZURE OF PRISONERS’ STIMULUS PAYMENTS VIOLATE THE FEDERAL EXEMPTION STATUTES WITHIN THE CARES ACT AND THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNTIED STATES . CONSTITUTION WUETHER THE COURTS ERRED IN DENYING THE PETITIONER'S RULE 15(d) SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM REGARDING THE SETZURE OF HIS STIMULUS PAYMENT (Doc. 44] WHETHER THE COURTS ERRED IN DEVYING THE PETITIONER'S RULE 15(d) SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM REGARDING THE UNLAWFUL ASSIGUMENT OF DET | Moc. 44) \ | | | WHETHER THE COURTS SHOULD HAVE ASSIGNED THE PETITIONER COUNSEL |Doc. 46] | WHETHER THE COURTS ERRED TW DENYING THE PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR A EMERGENCY } PRELIMINARY Ttaiunerzson (Doc. 524 , WHETHER YH COURTS bRRED It DENYING THE PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR A ‘EXPERT! TO PERFORM AN AUDIT AND REPORT FOR THE COURT AND PARTIES [Doc. 56} WHETHER THE APPELLATE COURT HAP JURTSDICTION TO REVIEW THE PETITIONER'S ‘COLLATERAL’ APPHAL UNDER 28 US@ 9 1291 . | . | | | | | |