Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated during the criminal proceedings against him

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) | ; the alleged abfense_exphined, in the Conpleint.made to He phlve departments dispatch *|2.How.diel the police come lite Centachwtth the alleged victim, and the petitioner ? | PTD P aslo Search end sereure) on Fie,.and issued on. behabl oP Heo pebitlonar 9 | eet ene Ppcbnble use fc. Acrest promptly tecocded in the ch trick where the . Ailleged.o fenseas! Comautleg? pe icretinty regen ote fi petitioneg nal e_taecits of the tase held ? Were the_ Gra gs Meena Can , Site Pies uly organized at the Joly Ferm, A.D, Dh fe ES jal Sic ek ad in, pack nee de Od Ws. an brought bear on Hé.Grand Jury? ff taint uid 7 oP Used gen at este yp Crtaked by Stabe action invislation op the Const tubion or awe | 0, dhs. Lenten in. theclekeminallan, of lanl onareediny ? } LH as_the pelitioner_been_pa rung Ais, righ s.chlig nhl las paced 2 ly. were the pretrial omnibus.metlons. net. presented t the Convietlng Court by tha defense Counsel? , _Whs dic the onvicking Conc den the, ptktioners cights,to_a_5 val. trio] 4 . Why did it take the trial Court C44! clays ) after He pebitioners_in careerated, ty place hin on the Coucts_trial docket 2 ee 15, Were there.any procedural defullts? ; } {oa frensic expects analysis,dp Me evidince had) buen established, onal evidence in the Casey Could. thet have. He.evicence lo > bhee_alleg el Crime? I, Wes.thewalleged { (3._Is_ the petitioner actually. innocent oe _ ae PC easy have Uae fn te pati guy bond 4 reasensble some AOU OES 2, ls the alle ool lickin testimon about . un Soh Alleged Victim. s_testimony aboud the merits.ef phe Ca ‘ the Cina el he aliqed bBince BO Fase sso til Pats tig