No. 21-5703
Mark French v. Frank B. Bishop, Jr., Warden, et al.
IFP
Tags: constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-inquiry right-to-counsel trial-counsel trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-11-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it a constitutional violation when a trial court fails to inquire or address a defendant's written request about his concerns about his trial counsel representation, and/or to remove or replace that same counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. IS IT A CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION WHEN A TRIAL COURT FAIL'S TO INQUIRY OR ADDRESS A DEFENDANT'S WRITTEN REQUEST ABOUT HIS CONCERNS ABOUT HIS TRIAL COUNSEL REPRESENTATION, AND/OR TO REMOVE OR REPLACE THAT SAME COUNSEL?
Docket Entries
2021-11-15
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2021)
Attorneys
Mark French
Mark French — Petitioner