No. 21-5711

Irving Alexander Ramirez v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-09-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights courtroom-conduct courtroom-decorum due-process fair-trial jury-influence public-passion spectator-displays
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether spectator displays in a criminal jury trial should be prohibited as inherently prejudicial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether as a rule, to keep the courtroom free from improper influences on the jury, spectator displays relevant to the case such as uniforms, buttons, and signs should be prohibited from a criminal jury trial as inherently prejudicial. What rule should apply to relevant spectator displays in determining whether a defendant’s constitutional rights to a fair trial and due process have been violated. ii STATEMENT OF

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Petition DENIED.
2021-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-12-02
Reply of petitioner Irving Alexander Ramirez filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-18
Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
2021-10-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 19, 2021.
2021-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 20, 2021 to November 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 20, 2021)

Attorneys

Irving Alexander Ramirez
Maria Jesus MorgaCalifornia Office of the State Public Defender, Petitioner
State of California
Elizabeth Winsor HerefordCalifornia Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Alice Jane Bemis Lustre — Respondent