Shikeb Saddozai v. Kristen Esterheld, et al.
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Whether plaintiff's claims are cognizable under 42-U.S.C.S-1983-1985-1986-1988
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Whether plaintiff's claims are cognizable under 42 U.S.C.S. | 1983; 1985; 1986; 1988,as well as Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution for relief. | Whether District Court and U.S.Court of Appeals erred in their review that discriminatory treatment existed and enforced by defendant(s) exclusively against plaintiff | denying Equal Protection Clause and Due Process. ; Whether the District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals standard of review was deficient with relevant decisions | of this court and erred denying plaintiff's properly | stated rule of law. ‘ Whether plaintiff demonstrated a "Substantial Showing" of denial of Constitutional rights of the scope and effect of the two clauses, Fqual Protection and Due Process, is the same that protect Citizens from deprivations of life, liberty, or property by the | federal and State governments under the law. | i