No. 21-5730

Shikeb Saddozai v. Kristen Esterheld, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction judicial-review section-1983 standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-12-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether plaintiff's claims are cognizable under 42-U.S.C.S-1983-1985-1986-1988

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Whether plaintiff's claims are cognizable under 42 U.S.C.S. | 1983; 1985; 1986; 1988,as well as Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution for relief. | Whether District Court and U.S.Court of Appeals erred in their review that discriminatory treatment existed and enforced by defendant(s) exclusively against plaintiff | denying Equal Protection Clause and Due Process. ; Whether the District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals standard of review was deficient with relevant decisions | of this court and erred denying plaintiff's properly | stated rule of law. ‘ Whether plaintiff demonstrated a "Substantial Showing" of denial of Constitutional rights of the scope and effect of the two clauses, Fqual Protection and Due Process, is the same that protect Citizens from deprivations of life, liberty, or property by the | federal and State governments under the law. | i

Docket Entries

2021-12-06
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
2021-07-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Shikeb Saddozai
Shikeb Saddozai — Petitioner