Whether the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals has entered a decision that is in direct conflict with United States Supreme Court precedent and in conflict with other United States Courts of Appeals on the same important matter, as mainly the duty of the trial court to inquire into conflict of interest as brought to its attention by a timely motion to dismiss court-appointed attorney, and also whether defense attorneys have a duty to advise the court of the problem

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the 3” Lircvit Court of Appeals hos . entered a choctcion thet Is in direct tontlct wan the United States Supreme Court precedent Onol me bontlcct wth other United States Courté of Nppeel ov the Same Important moter, oe Mainly the duty of the trol tort to InQuire into Contlect of criteve st brought to its attention by a timely puotion tL dismiss Court Ojpowed attorning Filed by & dleferdarnt, ond also ug n Hon defens atiprnery s have por me onduice of interest te Advise the ae 4 of the problem. Court at Mme ( Contin ved ) Question Two! whether Due Freess requires Federal Covrts to review Ineflectwe Assistance of Creal Counsel claims de nov? when proceedings in tm Gste texas fat pf Texas L to provide & meaning ful Corrective process Such tret these Claims are rot Folly or whether tyr Supreme Covet Shovlel exerCise its eQvitable power over habeas Corpys Asewtanch of Trick Comset claims from “Texas rder . !) dle nove vactrey tren U ag vse. 2254 (I