No. 21-5749

Krishna Mote v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: article-iii case-or-controversy civil-procedure injury-in-fact jurisdiction standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-11-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its application of the test for standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : QUESTIONS ; (1) Whereas can a Court of Appeals implicate a statement by the Middle District Court on assumption to rectify the Statement? : (2)Whereas does the fifth Amendment Due process of Law allow Courts to change decisions to deny Petitions. (3) Whereas When the District Court dismissed an indictment without Prejudice, and re-indict the Petitioner in 2011 under a new act ( Fair Sentencing Act) and sentenced the Petitioner under a new sentencing Guildline enhancement §2D1.1(B)(12) that didnot exist during the alleged Covered Offence in 2007, Does this create an Ex Post Facto Problem. (1) ,

Docket Entries

2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Krishna Mote
Krishna Mote — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent