Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its application of the test for standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTIONS ; (1) Whereas can a Court of Appeals implicate a statement by the Middle District Court on assumption to rectify the Statement? : (2)Whereas does the fifth Amendment Due process of Law allow Courts to change decisions to deny Petitions. (3) Whereas When the District Court dismissed an indictment without Prejudice, and re-indict the Petitioner in 2011 under a new act ( Fair Sentencing Act) and sentenced the Petitioner under a new sentencing Guildline enhancement §2D1.1(B)(12) that didnot exist during the alleged Covered Offence in 2007, Does this create an Ex Post Facto Problem. (1) ,
Docket Entries
2021-11-08
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Krishna Mote
Krishna Mote — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent