Whether the conflict of interest between a public defender's office and its appellate division violates a defendant's constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED — ~OTs conflicfed conse | Actual/Re, | carllect of iuteesh tne Fechive Cone| 2? Aniaviralation of Const tutvana | . Rights ? @ Do ABA Cor state eauiyel eut> ethic ‘des have Gaye a — bearilg ov Gtawd ihg wh Laws ? . | 3) ue there. Conci Aver seg be law yous vidlatron Sacd ; Rules 7 OF does sust the defen dent got The Slot Gtraws of 4. law yer thal willing ly Vid lates Saca . ethic rules.? Ts There recorse for a deo Fondant : . when a lawyer ycolates The ethical ples? And does docs Not nor & the co af a violation he/she \s making ¢ : ‘ a : ae 3B. oR does the “ght” of hiner GAC Self a <\ ceiminat thy thom solves Over ve The Sefer dents rights 1D effective (ce uh -ConFlieted ) counsels g As of the 204 MA “Day beak” the MH Public Def “ 5Chice loting bas The WA Agpellate Def pregriin a5 , a Aivegcon ~ Same Esch . Does This, with ange, Goperate. Evom the Case lew, Wale thom the Sa.mMe Cor me Gr | gn Elak 0€ intenst a