No. 21-5751

Charles Elmer Kovary v. Willis Chapman, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: alibi-witness constitutional-rights criminal-procedure dna-evidence due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-relief trial-counsel witness-testimony
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was Appellate Counsel Ineffective for Failing to Raise Certain Claims?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED >) Was AfPellose Counsel Wwetrective ter Laing to aise. 4oin\ counsels WmekPecthiveness for Kaling Jo § ully Myestigadte Alloi wtsness, and hel? Alibi wikness Prepare a cory ec} oS idawt> Mot the Gory wold undersdand in legal terms and to have Al\bi yuviness tesyry ? A) Was Appe\iake Counsel ineMedive Le Paling to Taise Mic CoONSAS WelReckiveness Kor Failing yo Tequesy & wehest of DNA Eviderse, of ToS semen Stang lofi by PerPercator cee CAME Scene, . proves neon use Luda DMA analysis of Pepe TAOS biclDgice eral . ade SNA analysis Vhak —an mye nen . eden : otto. come back with a profile Kod wWwou\d dems s\ | Pationers Yacval innocence 2 NSHONR

Docket Entries

2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent Willis Chapman to respond filed.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Charles E. Kovary
Charles Elmer Kovary — Petitioner
Willis Chapman
Fadwa A. HammoudMichigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent