No. 21-5759

Kevin Hall v. Kul Sood, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-09-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights deliberate-indifference eighth-amendment medical-treatment prison-healthcare supervisory-power wexford-health-sources
Key Terms:
Punishment
Latest Conference: 2021-11-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did prison medical professionals and the prison's healthcare contractor violate the Eighth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did prison medical professionals, and the prison's healthcare contractor, Wexford Health Sources Inc., through a course of easier and less "effecacious"' treatment, violate the Eighth Amendment? /multiple Does "medical visits" to prison medical professionals, contracted by Wexford Health ; Sources Inc., necessarily result in constitutionally adequate treatment? Has the medical treatment received, and the actions of attending medical staff, actually caused suffering, harm, and irreversable injury as a result of deliberate indifference? Did the U.S. Court of Appeals, as concerns denial of attorney representation, so far depart from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power? : II.

Docket Entries

2021-11-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
2021-09-29
Waiver of right of respondent Paula Young, Sara Faetanini, Dr. Catalino Bautista, Dr. Kul Sood, Dr. Stephen Ritz, Lola Parrish & Wexford Health Sources, Inc. to respond filed.
2021-08-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Kevin Hall
Kevin Hall — Petitioner
Paula Young, Sara Faetanini, Dr. Catalino Bautista, Dr. Kul Sood, Dr. Stephen Ritz, Lola Parrish & Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Julie Ann TeuscherCassidy Schade, LLP, Respondent