Was the Appellate Commissioner correct in determining that Petitioner needed to have served Respondents as 'adverse parties' to the appeal?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED lt) Was the Appellate Commissionel Correct in detetmming that Petitener needed to have Secved Respondents as ‘adverse pasties’ \o 4the appeal Underlying this petihon, whereas the espordenks Wad nether appeared or. been Served, nor in any mannec taten pact in any lowes Circuit Court Proceedings ~ the Suit underlying the appeal having been dismissed for want of prosecutan, for lack of service vpon Respondents *2 2) Was it justified far the Oregon Supreme Court to have refused +o veview the appellate Cowt decisrin dy deom Respandents as ‘adverse! porhés — whereas Petibener Contend ed that Respondents were only apposing Nonadverse defendants tv the appeal (without any obligahon to have een timely Served with a nohce of appeal)? * Petinoner hawing made this explicitly clear in their Gied notice of appeal— that neither Respondent was an aAdvetse party. Pag e 2 of II Hejazi V: Buseman Pc and Buseman