No. 21-5762

Hamid Michael Hejazi v. City of Eugene Police Department, et al.

Lower Court: Oregon
Docketed: 2021-09-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure court-jurisdiction due-process jurisdiction jurisdictional-dismissal legal-standing oregon-supreme-court service-of-process standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2021-11-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the Appellate Commissioner justified in dismissing the appeal on jurisdictional grounds

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Was +he Appeliate Commissioner justified in dismissing Perirener's appeal on the jusisdichonal ground of need for Service | of We notice of appeal upon all adverse parties — when, as | Petitiener made it Cleac in their filed notice of appeal, and aS was WNue, based m dhe fact € Respondents not being adverse, they never having appeated tn any lower Circuit Court proceeding (there being none held ), noe in the Case at all, never having been Served or Summed (the lower Court case never having been filed at all to begin withom a denied Firing Cee defeccal of Waiver application) ? 2) Was the Oregon Supreme Court justified m refusing to grant review even though the Appellate Commissioner was Completely acbitrary and unjustified Page 2 of II Wejazi Ve Eugene Police Dept., et al.

Docket Entries

2021-11-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
2021-10-22
Waiver of right of respondent State of Oregon to respond filed.
2021-08-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Hamid Michael Hejazi
Hamid Michael Hejazi — Petitioner
State of Oregon
Benjamin Noah GutmanOregon Department of Justice, Respondent